Mobile Health – Integra LLC

Tag Archive for: Mobile Health

Where to Turn When Researching: A Database for Innovative Global Health Initiatives

Photo Credit: Results for Development Institute

While working on a mhealth project that expanded across three countries, I was tasked with researching both the public health and mobile sectors in each country. Having worked on a number of strategic plans to implement mhealth, I knew what technology was being used in the field and the challenges that mobile technology can solve. But I had less knowledge about the public health challenges and the innovative, non-mobile health projects in these nations. In need to fully understand these two areas, I came upon the Center for Health Market Innovations (CHMI) website. CHMI has an extensive and straightforward database to research the numerous innovations going on in developing countries. I was able to customize my search and focus on the three nations as well as the health focus (ie maternal and child health, HIV/AIDS, chronic diseases, etc) and its technology (ie mobiles, GPS, radio, etc). It gave me knowledge of the specific health challenges in those nations as well as how mobile technology could be leveraged in existing programs and policies.

About CHMI

The origins of CHMI were born out of a study in 2008-2009 entitled “The Role of the Private Sector in Health Systems.” It focused on further understanding how the private sector participated in the health care sector in the developing world. CHMI was created as a continuation of the initial research through funding from the Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. The goal was to expand on the research in order to support the advancement of health markets. CHMI’s role is to identify and analyze programs and policies that improve private sector health care delivery and financing for the poor. These include mHealth programs, health franchises, health savings programs, consumer education programs, and many more. By developing this database, governments, NGOs, and social entrepreneurs can include their own innovative health programs as well as search for others. To date, there have been 978 completed programs with 117 still in the pipeline, all across 104 countries. As mentioned above, the database allows users to customize their search based on the categories below:

Profile Status (completed or not)
Program Type (type of innovation)
Health Focus
Country
Target Population
Legal Status (private, nonprofit, government, etc)
Target Geography
Reported Results
Source of Funding
Technology Used

Along with researching innovative programs, the database allows users to connect directly with organizations running these programs and provides content about new programs and update others already in it. It is also downloadable so users can play with the data for their research. The ability to discover and develop profiles of the programs has been primarily done by both partner organizations and CHMI staff. But recently third parties with no CHMI affiliation, such as researchers or program managers, have also submitted profiles. By having a community approach, the database has the most up-to-date information and data. CHMI also takes responsibility to verify information with the organizations on the ground when possible. If this is not possible, the CHMI staff tries to be as transparent with this knowledge. This includes rating the quality of the information source. Here is how they break it down:

High: Interview with high-level employee of the organization and/or a site visit.
Medium: High-quality website or contact with a high level employee of the organization, trusted secondary source (e.g., a report published by a collaborating organization)
Low: Secondary online sources or other publicly available resources

In the end, CHMI wants to increase the information available about recent health innovations, assist donors/investors in identifying new models to fund, give policymakers greater knowledge about designing health policies, connect implementers in order to share lessons and knowledge, and provide data and impact evaluations submitted by partners or third parties.

With information about innovations in development (mostly around mobile technology) spread throughout the internet, CHMI has taken the reigns to promote and show the ground-breaking health market innovations. The partnership approach and focus on gathering the most accurate information gives the CHMI an extensive and trustworthy database of knowledge for practitioners, policy makers, and donors to learn the most innovative approaches.

If you have any questions or would like to include an innovative health program in the database, please contact CHMI at chmi@resultsfordevelopment.org.

April 23, 2012/by actualize

Agriculture, Health, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

Alerta MINSA: The First mHealth Project in Latin America

Photo Credit: rcrwireless.com

In the news and blogosphere on ICT4D, there is a heavy focus on Sub-Saharan Africa, mostly because mobile phones have exploded across the continent. But we have missed many of the innovations that are going on in Latin American and the Caribbean. In an effort to reach back to the history of mHealth, I was able to connect with one of the first individuals to work in mhealth, even before the term mhealth had been coined – Ernesto Gozzer, currently working as a Researcher and STC with the World Health Organization and is an Associate Professor at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.

While he could not confirm that the project was the first in the world, Alerta MINSA was the first in Latin America. Originally launched on February 6^th, 2001 in the Cañete Town Hall Auditorium (in the southern part of Lima), Ernesto admitted they had no idea they were pioneering mhealth. “We thought we were helping to improve the health information systems for critical health issues. The aim was using available technology to connect the unconnected, to help to reduce the digital divide.”

Alerta MINSA stands for Alert Ministry of Health and was initially funded by InfoDev. The tool allowed for disease surveillance to send via text messages and through the internet. The information is then consolidated in a database. Alerts can then be sent when thresholds have been surpassed as well as automated reports and compiling data in tables, graphs, and maps in dashboards. Currently Alerta is the “official disease surveillance system” of the Peruvian Air Force, Navy, and Army. It also has been used in other countries including Ecuador, Panama, Tanzania, Rwanda, Colombia, and Paraguay.

My favorite idea that Ernesto talked about was the following: “So, this was not a pilot but what I call a local innovation that expanded beyond borders.” I love this quote because an innovative solution was created to solve a specific problem using mobile phones. Instead of it being the sexy thing to do, it was done out of necessity. The developers use the power of mobile phones to provide a solution to a problem. This is an important lesson that has been mentioned before in the mhealth space. Start with the problem first and then develop a solution around it. This is as true today as it was 11 years ago.

April 14, 2012/by actualize

Agriculture, Health, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

More Randomized Controlled Trials in mHealth Please!

mHealth is by no means the magic bullet (I believe there is no magic in international development; every situation is so different and complex for one solution). But it could help to improve the public health workforce or women’s health in developing countries. In order to determine this, there needs to be further field research. And it needs to focus around the true impact of the intervention. While the social sciences are imperfect and it is very difficult to know an intervention’s true impact (meaning if the mobile device is removed, how different would the outcome be), there is a best practice to assess the true impact – Randomized Controlled Trails.

There are multiple examples of projects providing “evidence,” but they tend to only show who has been reached (reproductive health information was received by 20,000 mothers). We need further evidence to show that mobile phones and/or their content are creating the sought behavior change. mHealth could be like microfinance where there has been a lack of evidence showing the impact of it on families. But, knowing this, microfinance is still essential for the bottom of the pyramid to access necessary formal financial services (savings/insurance/credit). In the same light, mhealth tools help fill in gaps (ie sending information via text message instead of walking it in paper form). But does it really make a community health worker (CHW) more effective and efficient at their jobs? It will give women and families reproductive health information. But does it improve ART intake or change a women’s behavior? These are the questions that must be answered in order to know the true impact of mhealth applications.

To the benefit of the sector, RCTs have and are being conducted. At the ICTD 2012 Conference in Atlanta a few weeks ago, Brian DeRenzi, who completed his Ph D at University of Washington in the department of Computer Science and Engineering, presented his paper entitled “Improving Community Health Worker Performance Through Automated SMS.” As the title indicates, the focus of his research was testing the impact of reminders via SMS to CHW’s follow up visits to their patients. The study was conducted in Tanzania and in collaboration with D-Tree International, Pathfinder International, and Dimagi. It included one pilot project and two larger studies. In the end, the reminders reduced the average number of days between follow up visits to patients by CHWs. This is a clear benefit to helping improve the care provided to patients. But the study also provided further knowledge into issues with patient reminders to CHWs. This included the benefit of having the supervisor of the CHWs receive a SMS reminder if their employee did not conduct a follow up visit. When the supervisor was taken out of the equation, the performance of CHWs decreased considerably. This is an important design aspect to the program that could have been missed without a RCT. By testing the removal of the supervisor, it showed that the mobile phones helped but combining it with the supervisor’s real time knowledge of their work provided greater incentive to the CHWs to follow up with greater regularity with their patients.

Another example of an RCT currently in progress is in Ethiopia. In a very similar study, Kate Otto, from the World Bank, is working in collaboration with Addis Ababa University to test the impact of mhealth interventions on the care provided by Health Extension Workers (HEWs) in rural areas to women and child (In Ethiopia, the HEWs are equivalent to CHWs in Tanzania). The research question is “does the use of a mobile phone-based tool enabling patient registration, appointment reminders, and inventory management – in the hands of Health Extension Workers – result in improved maternal and child health outcomes in a rural Ethiopian setting?” The goal is to find evidence supporting the use of mhealth interventions with HEWs.

Since these RCTs seem very similar, it would be easy to say that the World Bank and Addis Ababa University should have simply copied the intervention and implementation of the best practices learned in Tanzania. But this is the power of RCTs. Since each region is different with varying degrees of complexity, solutions that work in one area will not produce the same outcomes in another. Just because a program and intervention worked one place does not mean the same model or theory will work in another setting (see m-Pesa). The benefit of RCTs is that it will assist in finding interventions that will provide a solution for the region/country. This is especially necessary in the mhealth sector as the complexity of each situation dictates the need for specific program requires. But we are not sure what those are. The benefit of RCTs is that it can remove these variables and focus directly on the how and why interventions work or not, especially in behavior change. And as shown in Tanzania, it helps us understand what is and provides insight into areas of improvements.

Funding is always going to be an issue with RCTs. But the knowledge gained makes up for the investment by further understanding the true impact (if any) of the device. In the end, we need to find answers to what changes behavior, especially the role of mhealth in the change. There has been a greater increase in RCTs in mHealth projects to test how mobile phones and their applications are improving health. But there needs to be more done.

For those interested in learning more about M+E in global health programs, there will be a panel through GHDonline.org at the beginning of April. Please find further information about the panel here.

April 3, 2012/by actualize

Agriculture, Health, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

Opening the Discussion of Data Privacy in mHealth

Photo Credit: Technorati.com

During New America’s Mobile Disconnect talk on February 9th, Katrin Verclas, Co-Founder and Editor of MobileActive.org, brought up an interesting question about data privacy in mhealth – what is being done to protect patient data in mhealth projects in developing countries?

“If you are gathering sensitive health data over completely clear text and insecure SMS, somebody’s HIV status, sensitive information protected by HIPAA standards in this country, completely unregulated by development organizations, they don’t self-regulate. Countries certainly don’t have any privacy or data protection stipulations…If we are talking about mobile telephony and mobile phones in development, we need to talk about how we protect the data that we are gathering, the information that we are distributing…”

Data privacy is an important, yet undiscussed topic. As Katrin mentioned, an individual’s health information is extremely personal, especially because it can be used against the person to make them a social outcast. But there is little talked about how patient information is being protected, especially the structure and framework of data protection on a large scale. As mentioned in the white paper “Barrier and Gaps Affecting mHealth in Low and Middle Income Countries” by the Earth Institute at Columbia University, many mhealth studies expressed the need for data protection and some measures were taken. But further security steps need to be taken as projects scale into national programs.

First, security is a tough question to answer in any setting. In the U.S., there are strict laws that require health information to be protected (HIPAA). Corporations holding patient health information must internally regulate how this information is being stored and transmitted in order to avoid penalties (both monetary and brand loss) if data is lost or there is a security breach. Along with setting user policies to further protect this sensitive data, corporations also leverage security software to protect against internal and external data lost. This includes protection against network attacks or unprotected lost/stolen devices. In these cases, the companies not only spend money on security measures but also employ a team solely focused on security. Chief Information Security Officer is vastly becoming an important and necessary role with large enterprises.

But the reason for all these security measures is the value individuals and families put on the privacy of their health information. Similarly to people protecting information about their finances, people want to keep their personal and family health information private. With the stigma of specific diseases or the unknown of the future as testing, diagnosis, and treatment is occurring, individuals and families want to have the power to inform others when they are ready. Do individuals and families in other countries place the same value on their health information? My guess is very much so.

But, as Katrin mentioned, many of the countries using mobile phones for data transmission do not have strict data privacy laws to regulate how patient data is protected. This leads to a lack for incentive for development organizations to create their own data protection policies which includes user policies and technology solutions to protect the storage and transmission of patient information. The GSMA recently began a movement to support data privacy on mobile devices. This includes providing principles, guidelines and resources in order to tackle the new challenges of data protection on global mobile networks. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and infoDev have created the ICT Regulation Toolkit to provide insight and best practices for policy-makers, government regulators and the telecommunication sector to implement telecom policies. There is a section directly focused on Data Protection and Privacy Laws. While these are steps forward, they are more generally focused on the over telecom industry. There needs to be a greater focus on the mhealth sector as it continues to grow.

Some organizations have included data privacy in mhealth projects. eMOCHA, developed by Johns Hopkins Center for Clinical Global Health Education, is a program for Android smartphones that stores and transmits data. Included in the program is security on both the endpoint device (the smartphone) and the servers. The servers that store the data are encrypted to protect against internal leaks. The smartphones also utilized encryption to send messages. They also are password protected in order to prevent data access if the phone is lost or stolen. Dimagi has also used technology to protect both internal and external leaks. This includes individual logon passwords and full data encryption on handsets and full server database encryption and auditing of who has logged into the database. It would be great to hear from other mhealth developers to see what they are doing to protect data. As is the case with the open dialogue of discussing best practices implementing and scaling programs in the mhealth community, it would be beneficial to the sector to share advice on data privacy.

MobileActive has been focusing on data security lately with the release of their SaferMobile website. It has helped to open the discussion and provides knowledge and advice to activists, human rights defenders and journalists to better protect their mobile privacy in their jobs. Those in the mhealth community should piggyback on their work. The discussion of data protection has been brought up before, but it is time to have it on the forefront of developers and implementers minds working on mhealth projects in developing countries. The goal is to understand all issues of data privacy (from the regulatory, technological and social aspects) and how we can make sure to always be aware of the patient’s right to privacy. It will be interesting area to continue to follow, and I hope this at least opens the door to a more in depth discussion on the topic.

March 28, 2012/by actualize

Agriculture, Health, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

Two Guides You Must Read Before Using Mobile Technology for Behavior Change

Photo Credit: Larissa Frei

As the desire to utilize mobile phones in international health projects has increased in the last few years, organizations continually ask a similar question, “We want to use mobile phones. Now what?” But the decision to introduce or start a mhealth project needs to come after answering many questions before “now what?” especially when dealing with behavior change communication projects. Enter Abt Associates, FrontlineSMS, and Text to Change. Two guides have recently been released to help organizations assess whether or not mobiles are the right tool, and if they are, the process moving forward. One is from Abt Associates and is entitled mBCC Field Guide: A Resource for Developing Mobile Behavior Change Communication Programs. The other one was created in collaboration between FrontlineSMS and Text to Change and is entitled Communications for change: How to use text messaging as an effective behavior change campaigning tool.

mHealth is a sexy term these days but it is not always the best approach to creating behavior change. Simply using mobile devices will not instantly make your project/program better. But when designed and implemented with the end user in mind, they can be a cheaper and more direct tool to pass information along in order to change behaviors.

Reason for the Guides

Abt and FrontlineSMS/Text to Change saw the need to have a guide that can lead practitioners through the necessary steps in order to see if and how a mobile solution could be used in the field. Each guide clearly shows the need to analyze on how a mobile intervention would fit into a program. They both do a great job pointing out that every situation is different and that a mhealth intervention must fit into the context and infrastructure of the region. But they are structured in very different ways and have noticeably different lengths (50 pages vs 7 pages). The Frontline/Text to Change guide is structured more like a checklist and mostly focused on text message interventions. The mBCC guide is longer and walks the reader thoroughly through the assessment process. But the guides show how to strategically think about behavior change communication projects.

The mBCC Field Guide

Abt Associates broke down the guide into 6 chapters with each chapter focusing on a specific topic. Each chapter lays out the necessary research and design that must be conducted in order to successfully utilize mobiles for behavior change. The chapters are in order of how one should follow the process (even though you can pick and choose chapters if you have already completed a chapter before reading). The chapters include Situation Analysis, Audience Segmentation, Behavior Change Objectives, Message Development, Tools & Technologies, and Monitoring and Evaluation. Each chapter also includes tools in the form of Excel templates that can be utilized to complete the assessment discussed in the chapter. With a high level of detail along with the structured worksheets, this guide is designed for those who are new to mhealth and are seeking a step-by-step walk through from the start.

Frontline/Text to Change

As mentioned before, the FrontlineSMS and Text to Change guide is more of a checklist of things to research and discuss before designing and implementing a mobile-based behavior change project. With a DOs and DON’Ts list, it covers context, content, developing campaigns, and monitoring and evaluation. This skeleton format is a quick read and is probably better suited for an organization that either has worked with mobile devices before or is somewhat knowledgeable about mhealth.

Both are very useful guides for the intended audiences. With mhealth still only mostly being used in pilot projects, we need to find answers to what changes behavior. The greater number of projects that use mobile devices for behavior change communication (when they are deemed most appropriate) means more data and evidence will be produced in order to show the true impact of mobile devices. These guides give the necessary direction to organizations to start leveraging mobile devices in health projects and discover what does and does not work along with why, which is the most important question of all.

As an ending note, the mBCC Field Guide was presented by Gael O’Sullivan, Stephen Rahaim, and Shalu Umapathy from Abt Associates during the latest mHealth Working Group meeting. They explained that the guide needed to be a “living document,” and they requested feedback about it from mhealth practitioners, especially those in the field. Please visit their website (http://www.mbccfieldguide.com/) in order to provide any feedback. To provide feedback to FrontlineSMS and Text to Change, please find used the contact information here and here.

March 21, 2012/by actualize

Health, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

Made in Cameroon: Touch Screen for mHealth

Arthur Zang - Photo Credit: http://www.rnw.nl/africa

A 24 year-old Cameroonian has invented a touch screen medical tablet that enables heart examinations such as the electrocardiogram (ECG) to be performed at remote, rural locations while the results of the test are transferred remotely to specialists for interpretation.

The touch screen tablet – Cardiopad was invented by Arthur Zang, a young computer engineer born and trained in Cameroon at the Ecole Nationale Supérieure Polytechnique (ENSP) in Yaounde.

According to Zang, the Cardiopad is “the first fully touch screen medical tablet made in Cameroon and in Africa.” He believes it is an invention that could save numerous human lives, and says the reliability of the pad device is as high as 97.5%. Zang says he invented the device in order to facilitate the treatment of patients with heart disease across Cameroon and the rest of Africa. So far, several medical tests have been carried out with the Cardiopad which have been validated by the Cameroonian scientific community.

“The tablet is used as a classical electrocardiograph device: electrodes are placed on the patient and connected to a module that, in turn, connects to the tablet. When a medical examination is performed on a patient in a remote village, for example, the results are transmitted from the nurse’s tablet to that of the doctor who then interprets them, says Radio Netherlands.”

While doing his academic internship at the General Hospital of Yaounde, in 2010, Arthur Zang became aware of the difficulties faced by Cameroonians in accessing care related to the heart. The Central African country has an approximately 40 cardiologists for about 20 million population with almost all these cardiologists located in the two large cities of Yaounde and Douala.

Access to cardiologist by patients especially those living in remote cities is therefore a huge challenge. This severe deficit of medical personnel means that patients with heart ailments usually have to travel long distances to undergo heart examinations and consult with doctors. Even at that, it is still not easy. On some occasions, patients must make appointments months in advance, and some even die in the process of waiting for their appointment.

Photo Credit: Cardiopad

This is how the technology works. Both the cardiologist (in the city) and the nurse (in the remote community) need to have the Cardiopad. A patient in the remote community is connected to electrodes placed on his heart. These electrodes are connected to a module called Cardiopad Acquisition Mobile (CAM) via a Bluetooth interface, which transmits the heart signal to the Cardiopad after the signal has been digitized. The nurse can then read the heart beats, heart rate, and the intervals between each beat displayed on the Cardiopad, etc. All these data are then stored in a file and sent to the cardiologist’s Cardiopad via a mobile telecommunication network.

The Cardiopad is already generating a lot of interest in African tech and medical circles. Zang believes his invention will cut down the cost of heart examinations and he is currently looking for venture capital to commercially produce the device. Visit here for detailed information on the Cardiopad and its inventor.

February 14, 2012/by actualize

Agriculture, Health, Health, Maternal & Child Health, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

USAID MAMA initiative leading the way in mobile for maternal health projects

The USAID-initiated MAMA (Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action) project that utilizes cell phones to improve maternal health in developing countries gave an in-depth update at the latest mHealth Working Group meeting.

The pilot initiative, announced in May by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and co-sponsored by Johnson & Johnson, has begun work in Bangladesh. MAMA seeks to achieve “scale, sustainability and impact” by creating a replicable model of reaching low-income mothers and household decision-makers (husbands, mothers-in-law) through increasing the impact of current mHealth programs, providing technical assistance to new mHealth models, and improving methods of applying mobile technology to improving maternal health.

At the working group meeting, Sandhya Rao of USAID and Pamela Riley of USAID’s SHOPS (Strengthening Health Outcomes through the Private Sector) program discussed the status of Aponjon, the MAMA project in Bangladesh. Aponjon provides vital health information through mobile phones two times a week to expecting and new mothers, reminding them of when to receive checkups and how to stay healthy during the pregnancy. Bangladesh was chosen to pilot the project because the country’s government has been a leader in promoting and expanding access to ICTs and is very active in mHealth.

Photo credit: Council on Foreign Relations

In order to bring it to a national scale, the burgeoning MAMA initiative has established private, public, and NGO partnerships to help implement its activities, and is carefully monitoring its methods and practices to ensure that the project is reaching its target goals. For example, Aponjon is constantly tweaking the content of its phone messages so that mothers and decision-makers understand, retain and relate to the information given.

Photo credit: Highmark Medicare Services

Another aspect of the project that MAMA will be monitoring is its business models to determine which are the most sustainable and effective. Currently, customers pay service providers to retrieve the phone messages. Text messaging is the cheapest method for remitting information in most developing countries, but many of the poorest clients are unable to read the texts. The alternative is interactive voice response (IVR) through which customers can hear recorded messages at a much lower cost than call centers but more than texting. MAMA and its partners are experimenting with different pay schemes, such as subsidizing rates, working with service providers to offer low rates or donate funds to the project, and charging fees based on usage.

It will take the new initiative years before sustainable, reliable, and replicable models are in place. What is clear is that the potential for improving maternal and newborn health through the use of mobile phones is being tapped.

September 29, 2011/by actualize

Agriculture, Health, Mobile, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

Mobile Operators as Clinical Service Providers?

Mobile Health Live recently held a live broadcast webinar from Kuala Lumpur to examine the role of mobile operators in the delivery of mobile health services.

The webinar was moderated by Richard Cockle of the GSMA and featured contributions from Claire Margaret Featherstone of Maxis, Irfan Goandal from Qtel, Dr Mubbashir Iftikhar from KPJ Healthcare and Craig Friedrichs from the GSMA.

The panel discussed the opportunities open to operators working within the mobile health sector, and highlighted a number of specific areas of interest where operators can provide tangible benefits to healthcare partners and their patients. According to the panel, support for a stretched public sector and the remote monitoring of patients with lifestyle diseases, such as diabetes and hypertension, are two key services that mobile operators can provide for the mobile health sector

The panel recognised the complex nature of the healthcare industry with multiple stakeholders and country specific regulation affecting local markets and discussed some of the work being undertaken to help facilitate the integration of mobile services into existing value chains.

If you weren’t able to tune in live to the webinar, you can now watch it on demand.

September 21, 2011/by actualize

Agriculture, Health, Health, Health Systems, HIV/AIDS, Infectious Diseases, Maternal & Child Health, Mobile, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

Mobile health quizzes get a 2.7 million Euro boost

Text to Change (TTC), an mHealth non-profit organization based in the Netherlands, announced earlier this month that they will receive a €2.7 million grant to expand its services. TTC provides an SMS-based educational service to improve the health of citizens in eight countries in Africa and one in South America.

Already a big contributor in mHealth development, TTC hopes to become a leader in the field with the reception of its multi-million Euro grant from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs via Connect4Change (C4C), a consortium funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs that develops mobile based solutions on issues of poverty in Africa and Latin America. TTC will partner with C4C to expand its services to 11 more countries in Africa and South America by the end of this year.

Implementing ICT in the 11 countries is a top priority for both TTC and C4C. They are hoping the mutual partnership will make establishing ICT services an easier task as the expansion continues. According to TTC, the game plan calls for TTC to provide “low” technologies like SMS and mobile voice services while C4C provides “high” technologies such as mobile internet and video transfer. Therefore, TTC and C4C will play different roles.

C4C will also invest its time reaching out to local entities on the ground to strengthen ICT networks. TTC will focus on improving health outcomes through their established mobile phone initiatives.

TTC sets up their mobile platform through the recipient country’s mobile service infrastructure already in place. They then subscribe mobile phone users to their programs which use SMS communication to inform people of HIV testing, treatment clinics, and other health related services at no cost to the recipients.

TTC SMS system Photo Credit: TTC

TTC programs offer the information through a free educational quizzing service where participants are quizzed about a specific health topic. As participants answer the questions correctly, they are sent more rounds of questions, again at no cost. If the participant can answer enough questions correctly, he/she receives incentives such as phone credit, t-shirts and health products.

Thus far, TTC has reached thousands of individuals with their programs on HIV/AIDS, malaria, and reproductive health. Furthermore, to assess the impact of ICT in the countries they are currently working in, TTC will even conduct large scale ICT evaluations over the next few years in those countries.

TTC is poised to make an impact in ICT through their mobile services. Their work is just another example of how mobile phones are being used as a medium to educate, inform and save lives. The tag-team partnership with C4C will be expanded to all 11 target countries by the end of this year. However, we will have to wait some time before confirming the outcome of this joint strategic approach.

June 27, 2011/by actualize

Agriculture, Health, Health, Health Systems, Infectious Diseases, Mobile, Originally posted on the GBI Portal

2011 mHealth Trends- Webinar

MobiHealthNews held their first webinar, last Thursday, February 11,to discuss mobile health news and trends that will likely emerge during the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) 2011 annual gathering this year in Orlando. The webinar, which was attended by health professionals and practioners around the world was the first of its kind to predict future innovations and trends in mobile health.

Brian Dolan, MobiHealthNews editor, discussed the increasing expansion of peripheral health devices. Most of these were manufactured to assist medical practitioners in the developed world, but a few stood out as contenders for development context:

iHealth blood pressure dock

The iHealth blood pressure dock, which allows you to monitor your blood pressure blood on your iPod touch, iPhone, and iPad .

iPhone ECG case developed by AliveCor called the iPhonECG is a great new device. This gadget turns your Apple iPhone 4 into Electrocardiogram (ECG) by putting it into a special $100 case, however it has not been approved for sale in the U.S. yet. This would possess the capability to help healthcare works in the field monitor electrical activity of the heart and detect any heart disease, allowing them to assess the patient’s level of risk more accurately.
Cellscope which turns a cell phone into a high-magnification microscope.is a revolutionary approach to curing infectious disease are a huge upcoming trend that will launch throughout the year and gain FDA approval.
The CellScope

The HIMSS will hold its annual conference on February 20-24, where hundreds of corporate and non-for-profit members come together to collaborate on their mission to transform healthcare through effective use of IT and management systems.. Each year a few innovations stand out among the crowd. Two years ago, one of the big themes that emerged was that an electronic medical records (EMR) vendor developed a smartphone application. Last year, tablets such as the iPad, emerged as catalysts for mHealth devices to grow in usage.

February 14, 2011/by actualize

Tag Archive for: Mobile Health

Case Studies

Contact Details

Quick Links

About

Expertise

Impact

Join

Sign up for Updates